I shall try to explain the previous post. A good beginning would be:
"We have to stop! We have to! I need to..."
We did. And she swung open the car door, and stuck out her head. There was much retching accompanied by many sharp coughs. My heart fell, felt like it plunged eight stories and smashed against the sidewalk. I couldn't do a thing. And she was there suffering out of her mind.
We placed our hands on her back, rubbed it a little. I felt like Yossarian from Catch-22 going, "There, there... there, there" in some droning, catatonic exercise of comfort. She was our precious, hapless Snowden who did no wrong except to be caught in the German line-of-fire. I imagined little Germans running around in her, vandalizing her innards with sharp swastika replicas. Fuckin' Nazis, they're all after us.
It was then and there that I found purpose. Watching her. Watching pain play itself out with screeching violins that sawed at souls limb-by-limb.
Not more than an hour ago, she was locking lips with a boy at the club. Some red-blooded boy, some drunken sod with some derring-do. I doubt she even knew him. Poor bastard, I had thought... a billion flu organisms must've leapt from her tongue to his. Love is more disease than you know. My heart, for example, is a malignant tennis ball, always bouncing, never sticking. This game is rigged, mister Referee, rolling headless in your gilded grave.
Kiss now, puke later - a little pox spat on us by the great big universe, laboring on its celestial couch. But I was struck by this order of events. The imagery was so apt, so mind-shattering, so like a cat bursting forth from a cocoon (please, there shall be many references to cats in anything I write). It's only obvious that tragedy should follow love, and this would be followed by more love and more tragedy in endless, cyclical madness. My poor friend, who seemed at that moment to have puked out half her organs, was the most fabulously beautiful thing in the world, if only for what she represented.
Where does one start? Sisyphus pushing a large rock up a mountain only to have it roll down again, or Milton's Satan in heroic struggle against God? They both claw at that big, malignant question - why do we do it even though we are inevitably fucked beyond all hope of redemption? Why do we go on living our lives when Nature, red in tooth and claw, waits 'round the corner to snatch our babies when we parade them to the world? It took a splattering of vomit to remind me that meaningful life is defined by struggle against futility. That our tender humanness is birthed only when we rebel against the inevitable.
So I took perverse and guilty pleasure at watching my friend suffer, watching her cough every fiber of her already petite self on the asphalt. It is an indescribably terrible thing to witness someone close at their frailest, most defenseless, and yet the scene coursed all the same with strange, blood-red beauty. Kant would've called this 'sublime', the highest sort of beauty. The sort of thing that is simultaneously terrible and pleasurable to behold. Something frightening, painful, threatens to consume you whole, but also draws you in utterly mesmerized. I thought of Munch's 'Scream', how my friend was an all-too-vivid manifestation of the screamer with his gaping, shimmering 'O' of a mouth.
But I shall tell you why my friend was wafting in sweet sublimity, why she was my burning bush. She was poor Sisyphus and spurned Lucifer. Very soon, I thought, she will recover and love again only to be broken again to love again to be broken again to love again to be broken again, et cetera and ad nauseum. In this, she is both irredeemably and wonderfully human. I love that deliriously, to have my chest swell with pride and empathy for our beleaguered race. To declare, as if hopelessly intoxicated, I love us all if only because we are so happy and so fucked. And realizing, as Hesse's Goldmund did, that the former can never be torn from the latter. A face writhing in pain is uncannily alike one gasping in pleasure.
You must know that I am often a sad, resentful, self-hating thing. That I'm always wishing to be elsewhere and somebody else. I have a 'friend' (or rather acquaintance) who brings out the worst in me. He's an arrogant little (Donald) Trump-ish figure, claims to have an eye-popping harem of two girlfriends and extremely ambitious entrepreneurial plans. He's always telling me of the many girls he's splendidly charmed (or hoodwinked) into bed or at least hopeless infatuation (such stories are as entertaining as repeatedly stabbing your eye with a festering carrot).
Most of all, he claims to be a Very Serious person, just like the businessman in Saint-Exupery's 'The Little Prince', I thought once. Naturally, he often declares that he's only interested in "matters of consequence", to use Saint-Exupery's term, and has little time for idle fancies (like traveling), the very things persons such I treasure to deathly death and beyond. He also despises people who are un-serious, who do not have long-term, enterprising business plans in life. People like me. Although he shows his displeasure indirectly, always advising me this or that, or speaking contemptuously of other such persons.
Sometimes, I think he is right. After all, he is rather successful thus far (is popular with many people, including lobotomized throngs of girls, if he is to be believed), and knows exactly what he wants to do in life. Whereas I am virtually clueless, always lost in half-thoughts and vivid reveries. But the very curious incident of my friend puking revealed to me why this man of mans is tragically flawed.
He is, I think, surely a "monster of incuriosity", what philosopher Richard Rorty called our sweet beast, Humbert, of the tale 'Lolita'. Like Humbert, he is quite unable to accept things on their own terms, therefore is pathologically "incurious". Instead of playfully indulging in the multitudinous scents of the world, he feels he must conquer it, must claim it like some immortal trophy. But the world (and its women) cannot be owned just as the stars cannot be owned by the businessman in 'The Little Prince'. These things must be appreciated and cherished in their own nuanced ways, although we are both doomed and liberated to assign our subjective passions to each of them.
In short, my Very Serious friend is unable to experience wonder, nothing excites him. It is a sort of death, a sort of degenerative disease that numbs one's nerve endings. The death I fear more than any other death. He is unable, like your protagonist Sebastian, to behold a kitten and coo a lengthy, breath-taking 'Ooooooooooooooooooh!', or be moved by the random seeding of stars on an unsheathed night sky. Yes, with the ability of wonder inevitably comes the possibility of disappointment. But rip wonder from the human, and the human is essentially a machine, its faceless gears to be oiled from time to time with food, water, and obligatory intercourse. But in the end, is nothing more than awkward clutter on picturesque sceneries, a rusted tank at the bottom of the Seine. I am grateful that that is his tragedy, not mine.
So I am happy to be Sebastian, perhaps more than any other time in my life. I suppose I could be someone else, with wealth and physical attractiveness and other such shiny attributes, but I'd also likely lose the gift of wonder. And what is the human without wonder? There can be no meaning and no passion without wonder preceding them.
Children, of course, are the most apt to wonder. They are defined by wonder, by their little pokes, earnest questions, and senseless frolicks. Wasn't Humbert's regret at the end of 'Lolita' that he violently plucked Lolita from her place among children? The modern world and its fanatic multitudes of Very Serious peoples are then but a far more intimidating Humbert, stripped of all charm and erudition. They snatch children from their beds, and teach them to see the world in numbers and exchanges, in quotas and audits. The most depraved pedophile could do little worse.
As my friend puked, I wondered what my Very Serious friend would think of her. He would certainly write her off as un-serious, a pathetic thing not worth knowing. But only hours before she puked, she, another friend, and I were sitting cross-legged beside a road, imbibing large amounts of booze. We spotted a small animal hurrying across a telephone wire. Unsure whether to call it raccoon or fox (nevermind a fox on a wire would be a strange sight indeed), we cooked up a compromise portmanteau, "raccox", and lobbed it fearlessly at the animal. "Raccox!" we shouted in unison. And the animal scurried away, terrified that we'd conjured a strange aberration to be its linguistic shadow.
We laughed our hearts out. We giggled, dug our fingers futilely into the asphalt just to anchor ourselves. We hopeless children. We are so doomed, so beyond redemption of civilization, but yet so brimming with mad mirth. That is enough, I think.